I’ve just republished my Register of trials-prepared Marlins, with updates to six of the cars listed. The Register is linked from the Marlin Roadster page – scroll to the bottom of the page. Any more comments/ updates gratefully received.
In anticipation of the 2019 Cotswold Clouds on Sunday, I have updated my list of the sections used for the Clouds from its first running in 1962 up to last year (2018). I’m still missing quite a lot of records from the 1960s, 1970s, and 1990s, so if you have any route cards or results sheets buried away somewhere, please dig them out and let me have a copy!
The list is linked from the Cotswold Clouds page.
I’ve just updated, and re-published, the Marlin Roadster page, complete with a comprehensively updated Register of Trials-Prepared Marlins (open the Marlin Roadster page and scroll down to find a link to the PDF file). All the information is from sources in the public domain or has been provided to me by owners and ex-owners over many years. The Register now lists 111 cars, assuming that there are no duplicates in those noted as “?” in the Registration column, out of a total of 193 database records. 193 -111 = 82, which is the number of previous owners in my records.
This is the first update for several years and I hope that I have incorporated, correctly, all the information provided to me by owners and ex-owners. If you have sent me something, and I’ve omitted it or got it wrong, please accept my apologies and please send it to me again.
I’ve just updated the Troll T6 page, with a number of updates to the Troll T6 Register and updated information about the Troll T4.
7 January 2019. Page re-formatted with a couple of further, minor, content updates.
I’ve made some minor design changes to the site in anticipation of more frequent updating during 2019: the About page is now the Home Page; the Recent Posts are now shown in the sidebar; the header image has been removed; the header menus have been tidied-up; and the Miscellany page has been updated.
I’ve made some minor updates and corrections to the Documents page, and consequent corrections to some of the Trials pages.
Day 6 of Michael Leete’s research project, over on the Classic Trials Facebook Group and available from this link, has caused to me think, once again, about the formula for a ‘Perfect Trial’, as discussed many times in the past but maybe unknown to recent newcomers to the sport.
Tony Branson once referred to this as the Toulmin/Brown Formula, but I know it’s been chewed-over by many others, including Pete Hart, so I make no claim for originality. There is, of course, no such thing as a ‘perfect trial’ (except maybe the one that you win) but the intention was to define a trial that would be enjoyed by the maximum number of average competitors – “to please most of the people most of the time”.
The Formula states that the ‘Perfect Trial’ has:
- 1/3 of the sections climbed by every competitor, unless they make a stupid mistake. These sections might include the ‘Classic Lanes’ which Michael refers to in his Day 6 question.
- 1/3 of the sections climbed by most competitors, but presenting a challenge to the less expert, or those in less-developed cars.
- 1/3 of the sections are where the trial is decided, and can be as challenging as the organisers wish (to get a result on the hills and without resorting to special test times). These sections would probably include the forests and private land which Michael refers to in his Day 6 question.
It would be a boring world if every trial worked to this formula, and no one wants to change events like the Camel Classic (traditionally won with ‘cricket scores’), but I still think it’s not a bad re-starting point for events which may be struggling in their current format.
Someday I’ll get-around to analysing recent trials to see which are a best-fit with this formula, but don’t hold your breath.
I’ve just re-published, with very minor editing, the page from my previous Wheelspin website which lists lots of information about the (in)famous large-format book of Brunell photographs by Roy Bacon. Read more here. The cover of my version (1995, reprinted 1996) looks different from the one that Mark Milne has posted here on Facebook, so I hope the page numbering is the same. I now realise that I have a lot more information to update and improve my notes, it’s just a matter of finding the time to process it.
I have just updated the list of sections used for the Cotswold Clouds Trial. I will shortly be:
- Adding the information for the events from 1996 to 2003.
- Updating the information about the Grid References.
If anyone has any information about the sections used from 1972 to 1981, and from 1992 to 1995, do please contact me using the email address in the right-hand column.
The issue of MCC Night Runs, and whether they should continue, has been raised, yet again, on the Classic Trials Facebook Group – see my previous blog posting on this site.
As someone who loves the fact that MCC trials require tackling observed sections at night, but who hates the Touring Assembly and the hanging-around which this involves (Exeter and Lands End Trials only), I’ve done some investigation:
Exeter Trial (2018 data)
- Average distance from Starts (Cirencester, Okehampton, Popham) to Start ‘Proper’ (Haynes): 85 miles.
- Distance from my house to Haynes, avoiding motorways, according to Google Maps: 80-90 miles according to selected route.
- Distance from Haynes to the first section: 20 miles.
Lands End Trial (2017 data)
- Average distance from Starts (Cirencester, Popham, Plusha) to Start ‘Proper’ (Bridgewater): 94 miles.
- Distance from my house to Bridgewater, avoiding motorways, according to Google Maps: 80-90 miles according to selected route.
- Distance from Bridgewater to the first section: 23 miles.
Edinburgh Trial (2017 data)
- Distance from my house to Tamworth Services, avoiding motorways, according to Google Maps: approx. 70 miles according to selected route.
- Distance from Tamworth to the first section: 48 miles.
So, if I want the ‘adventure’ of the Night Run (= Touring Assembly in my view) as so many competitors claim they do, why can’t I just drive to the Start ‘Proper’, avoiding motorways, by whichever route I choose? I reckon that would save a minimum of two hours of hanging-around time or, more seriously, allow an additional two hours in bed before setting-off. If I chose to use motorways, I could save even more time or get even more pre-event sleep. Maybe even more significantly, my passenger could drive from home to the Start ‘Proper’, reducing driver fatigue still more.
For those who wish to trailer their car to the start, the current system means that the trailer is 85 miles (Exeter), or 95 miles (Lands End), from the Start ‘Proper’, with all the logistic hassle which this involves. Surely the system in place for the Edinburgh is preferable?
Personally, I can see no justification for the current system of Touring Assemblies and lots of good reasons why the Exeter and Lands End Trials should adopt, even if only on a trial (excuse the pun) basis, the same system as for the Edinburgh Trial.